Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1971

Gross v. Lockwood Folding Box Corp.

Gross v. Lockwood Folding Box Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided June 1, 1971 · Brien, Cohen, Consideration, Eagen, Jones, Pomeroy, Roberts, Took
443 Pa. 159; 277 A.2d 359; 1971 Pa. LEXIS 894

Gross v. Lockwood Folding Box Corp.

Opinion of the Court

Opinion

per Curiam,

The jury verdicts in favor of one of four similarly situated plaintiffs and in favor of defendant with respect to the other three plaintiffs, two of whom suffered undisputed property damage, are inconsistent ver*161diets justifying a new trial as to all. See Thompson v. Iannuzzi, 403 Pa. 329, 169 A. 2d 777 (1961); Pascarella v. Pgh. Rwys. Co., 389 Pa. 8, 131 A. 2d 445 (1957). See also Kessler v. Matlack, 210 Pa. Superior Ct. 450, 233 A. 2d 592 (1967).

Orders granting new trials affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Bell took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Mr. Justice Cohen took no part in the decision of this case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑