Holmes v. Broodno

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania September 15, 1972

Holmes v. Broodno, 222 Pa. Super. 478 (Pa. 1972)

Cercone, Hoffman, Hoppman, Jacobs, Packed, Packel, Spaulding, Watkins, Weight

Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Packed, J.,

The quashing of the appeal is reversed for reasons stated in Meta v. Yellow Gab Company of Philadelphia, 222 Pa. Superior Ct. 469, 294 A. 2d 898 (1972).

Dissenting Opinion

Dissenting Opinion by

Hoffman, J.:

I dissent for the same reasons as set forth in my opinion in Meta v. Yellow Cab Company of Philadelphia, 222 Pa. Superior Ct. 469, 294 A. 2d 898 (1972).

Watkins and Jacobs, JJ., join in this dissenting opinion.

Reference

Cited By: 7 cases
Status: Published