Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1972

Holmes v. Broodno

Holmes v. Broodno
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided September 15, 1972 · Cercone, Hoffman, Hoppman, Jacobs, Packed, Packel, Spaulding, Watkins, Weight
222 Pa. Super. 478

Holmes v. Broodno

Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Packed, J.,

The quashing of the appeal is reversed for reasons stated in Meta v. Yellow Gab Company of Philadelphia, 222 Pa. Superior Ct. 469, 294 A. 2d 898 (1972).

Dissenting Opinion

Dissenting Opinion by

Hoffman, J.:

I dissent for the same reasons as set forth in my opinion in Meta v. Yellow Cab Company of Philadelphia, 222 Pa. Superior Ct. 469, 294 A. 2d 898 (1972).

Watkins and Jacobs, JJ., join in this dissenting opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑