Commonwealth v. MAYBERRY

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Commonwealth v. MAYBERRY, 453 Pa. 619 (Pa. 1973)
306 A.2d 294; 1973 Pa. LEXIS 719
Jonhs, Eagan, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino

Commonwealth v. MAYBERRY

Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The judgments of contempt are affirmed.

Dissenting Opinion

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Manderino :

I dissent because the defendants were entitled to a jury trial. See United States v. Seale, 461 F. 2d 345 (7th Cir. 1972); Commonwealth v. Patterson, 452 Pa. 457, 308 A. 2d 90 (1973) (Manderino, J., dissenting).

Reference

Full Case Name
Commonwealth v. Mayberry Et Al., Appellants
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published