Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1975

Carlitz v. Penford Co.

Carlitz v. Penford Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided April 17, 1975 · Brien, Eagen, Jones, Manderino, Nix, Pomeroy, Roberts
461 Pa. 153; 335 A.2d 349

Carlitz v. Penford Co.

Dissenting Opinion

MANDERINO, Justice

(dissenting).

I dissent. The complaint filed by appellant Gordon Carlitz should not have been dismissed with prejudice.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Decree affirmed. Each party to pay own costs.

MANDERINO, J., filed a dissenting opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.