Carlitz v. Penford Co.
Carlitz v. Penford Co.
461 Pa. 153; 335 A.2d 349
Carlitz v. Penford Co.
Dissenting Opinion
(dissenting).
I dissent. The complaint filed by appellant Gordon Carlitz should not have been dismissed with prejudice.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Decree affirmed. Each party to pay own costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.