Commonwealth v. Giles

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Commonwealth v. Giles, 463 Pa. 88 (Pa. 1975)
343 A.2d 355; 1975 Pa. LEXIS 923
Brien, Consideration, Eagen, Jones, Manderino, Nix, Pomeroy, Remand, Roberts, Sentence, Trial, Would

Commonwealth v. Giles

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The Court being equally divided, the judgment of sentence is affirmed.

JONES, EAGEN and O’BRIEN, JJ., would affirm. ROBERTS, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ., would reverse the judgment of sentence and remand for a new trial. *89POMEROY, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Reference

Full Case Name
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Charles C. GILES
Cited By
14 cases
Status
Published