Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1975

Commonwealth v. Giles

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided July 7, 1975 · Brien, Consideration, Eagen, Jones, Manderino, Nix, Pomeroy, Remand, Roberts, Sentence, Trial, Would

463 Pa. 88; 343 A.2d 355; 1975 Pa. LEXIS 923

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The Court being equally divided, the judgment of sentence is affirmed.

JONES, EAGEN and O’BRIEN, JJ., would affirm. ROBERTS, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ., would reverse the judgment of sentence and remand for a new trial. *89POMEROY, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.