Anderson v. Bernhard Realty Sales Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Anderson v. Bernhard Realty Sales Co., 469 Pa. 488 (Pa. 1976)
366 A.2d 894; 1976 Pa. LEXIS 782
Brien, Eagen, Jones, Manderino, Nix, Pomeroy, Roberts

Anderson v. Bernhard Realty Sales Co.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Our disposition of these consolidated appeals is controlled by our decision in Lamp v. Heyman, 469 Pa.-, 366 A.2d 882 (1976).

In No. 108 March Term, 1975, the order of the Superi- or Court is affirmed.

In No. 317 January Term, 1975, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed.

ROBERTS, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which POMEROY and NIX, JJ., join.

Dissenting Opinion

ROBERTS, Justice

(dissenting).

I dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions in Lamp v. Heyman, 469 Pa.-,-, 366 A.2d 882, 889, 892 (1976) (ROBERTS, J., joined by POMEROY and NIX, JJ.; and POMEROY, J., joined by ROBERTS and NIX, JJ.).

POMEROY and NIX, JJ., join in this dissenting opinion.

Reference

Full Case Name
Robert B. ANDERSON v. BERNHARD REALTY SALES COMPANY, INC. Appeal of REVEST, INC., and Ronald Heurich Gilroy REID v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Cited By
5 cases
Status
Published