Karpe v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Karpe v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 487 Pa. 189 (Pa. 1979)
409 A.2d 29; 1979 Pa. LEXIS 785
Brien, Eagen, Flaherty, Larsen, Manderino, Nix, Roberts

Karpe v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LARSEN, Justice.

Appellant Irving Karpe filed an action in mandamus in Commonwealth Court seeking to require appellee, the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC), to issue a certificate to the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation on his behalf, which certificate was a condition precedent to appellant’s obtaining licenses for several van-type vehicles. The prayer for mandamus relief was properly denied by the Commonwealth Court as there was no clear legal right to the certification requested, nor was there an absence of an adequate remedy at law. We adopt the opinion of the *191Commonwealth Court per the Honorable Roy Wilkinson, Jr., in the instant case. See also, Unger v. Hampton Township, 437 Pa. 399, 263 A.2d 385 (1970).

The Order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed.

MANDERINO, J., did not participate in the decision of this case.

Reference

Full Case Name
Irving S. KARPE, t/a Yellow Cab Company v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published