Commonwealth v. Martin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Commonwealth v. Martin, 489 Pa. 484 (Pa. 1980)
414 A.2d 351; 1980 Pa. LEXIS 663
Brien, Eagen, Flaherty, Kauffman, Larsen, Nix, Roberts

Commonwealth v. Martin

Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s post-verdict motions, which contained some 43 assignments of error, were denied by the court below and found to be without merit. Appellant then appealed to this Court, raising an excess of 20 of these issues again. We have carefully reviewed these assignments of error, and we also find them to be without merit.

Consequently, the judgments of sentence are affirmed.

ROBERTS, J., concurred in the result.

Reference

Full Case Name
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Thomas W. MARTIN, a/k/a Eugene Collins
Status
Published