Petraglia v. American Motorists Insurance Company
Cases that cite this one
14 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hospital Support Services, Ltd. v. Kemper Group, Inc. And Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company (3d Cir. 1989)
- Evans Products Co. And Home Builders Mortgage Corp. v. West American Insurance Co. (3d Cir. 1984)
- Abels v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. (District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania 1984)
- NELSON v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY (District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania 2023)
- DAVIS v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 2021)
- Barr v. Public Storage (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas 2012)
- Prime Medica Associates v. Valley Forge Insurance Co. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2009)
- Caln Village Associates, LP v. Home Indem. Co. (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1999)
- Fennell v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance (Pa. Super. Ct. 1992)
- Williams Studio Division of Photography Ex Rel. Tallas, Inc. v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance (Pa. 1988)
- Serafin v. Motorists Insurance (Blair County Court of Common Pleas 1985)
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance (Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas 1984)
- Murphy v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co. (Pa. Super. Ct. 1983)
- Boothman v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance (Pa. Super. Ct. 1982)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Paul PETRAGLIA, Appellant,
v.
AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Richard D. Gilardi, Alfred S. Pelaez, Gilardi & Cooper, P.A., Pittsburgh, for appellant.
Charles Kirshner, Pittsburgh, for appellee.
Before O'BRIEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, NIX, LARSEN and FLAHERTY, JJ.
*33 ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Order, 284 Pa.Super. 1, 424 A.2d 1360, Affirmed. See Schreiber v. Pennsylvania Lumberman's Mutual Insurance Co., 498 Pa. 21, 444 A.2d 647 (1982).
NIX, J., files a concurring opinion.
KAUFFMAN and WILKINSON, JJ., did not participate in the decision of this case.
NIX, Justice, concurring.
The record in this case does not present a situation warranting equitable intervention; see, e.g., Schreiber v. Pennsylvania Lumberman's Mutual Insurance Company, 498 Pa. 21, 26, 444 A.2d 647, 649 (1982) (Nix, J. dissenting). Therefore I concur in the result.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.