Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1983

Commonwealth v. Ortiz

Commonwealth v. Ortiz
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided May 27, 1983 · Flaherty, Hutchinson, Larsen, McDermott, Nix, Roberts, Zappala
501 Pa. 186; 460 A.2d 752; 1983 Pa. LEXIS 553

Commonwealth v. Ortiz

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On direct appeal from judgments of sentence, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to convict of murder of the third degree, and further challenges, as a matter of law, the credibility of Commonwealth witness Alfred Beauchamp. After thorough review of the record, we have determined appellant’s arguments to be without merit.

Judgments of sentence affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.