Vanslander v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Vanslander v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 516 Pa. 363 (Pa. 1987)
532 A.2d 435; 1987 Pa. LEXIS 823
Appeal, Consideration, Dismiss, Flaherty, Former, Granted, Hutchinson, Larsen, McDermott, Merits, Nix, Papadakos, Reach, Zappala

Vanslander v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Opinion of the Court

*364ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The Court being evenly divided as to whether to render a decision on the merits, the appeal is hereby dismissed.

HUTCHINSON, Former J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY and McDERMOTT, JJ., would reach the merits of the appeal. LARSEN, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ., would dismiss the appeal as having been improvidently granted.

Reference

Full Case Name
David W. VANSLANDER, Sr., Sandra M. Vanslander, and David W. Vanslander, Jr., a minor, by David W. Vanslander, Sr., his guardian v. The AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY
Status
Published