Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1989

Bartholomew v. Foster

Bartholomew v. Foster
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided October 3, 1989 · Flaherty, Former, Larsen, McDermott, Nix, Papadakos, Reargument, Stout, Zappala
522 Pa. 489; 563 A.2d 1390; 1989 Pa. LEXIS 404

Bartholomew v. Foster

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The Court being evenly divided, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed.

*491STOUT, former J., did not participate in the decision of this case. McDermott, zappala and papadakos, jj., dissent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 1989, the Application for Reargument is denied.

ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ., dissent and would grant reargument.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑