Muhammad v. Strassburger, McKenna, Messer, Shilobod & Gutnick
Muhammad v. Strassburger, McKenna, Messer, Shilobod & Gutnick
598 A.2d 27; 528 Pa. 345; 1991 Pa. LEXIS 273
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Muhammad v. Strassburger, McKenna, Messer, Shilobod & Gutnick
Opinion
And now, this 8th day of May, 1991, the Petitioners’, Pamela Muhammad, Administratrix for the Estate of Nazir *346 Muhammad and Abdullah Muhammad, petitions for reargument and for clarification are hereby DENIED.
It is so ORDERED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.