Chatham v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania April 16, 1992

Chatham v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co., 605 A.2d 329 (Pa. 1992)

529 Pa. 494; 1992 Pa. LEXIS 263

Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Order affirmed.

LARSEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. CAPPY, J., files a concurring opinion.

Concurring Opinion

*495CAPPY, Justice,

concurring.

I concur in the result reached by the Majority in its per curiam affirmance. However, I do not agree that our decision in Azpell v. Old Republic Insurance Co., 526 Pa. 179, 584 A.2d 950 (1991) is controlling. See, Hackenberg v. Transp. Authority, 526 Pa. 358, 586 A.2d 879 (1991), (Concurring and Dissenting opinion, Cappy, J.).

Reference

Full Case Name: Florence CHATHAM, an Individual v. AETNA LIFE & CASUALTY COMPANY and State Farm Mutual Insurance Company. Appeal of AETNA LIFE & CASUALTY COMPANY
Cited By: 8 cases
Status: Published