Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1992

Chatham v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided April 16, 1992 · Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy

605 A.2d 329; 529 Pa. 494; 1992 Pa. LEXIS 263 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Order affirmed.

LARSEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. CAPPY, J., files a concurring opinion.

Concurring Opinion

*495CAPPY, Justice,

concurring.

I concur in the result reached by the Majority in its per curiam affirmance. However, I do not agree that our decision in Azpell v. Old Republic Insurance Co., 526 Pa. 179, 584 A.2d 950 (1991) is controlling. See, Hackenberg v. Transp. Authority, 526 Pa. 358, 586 A.2d 879 (1991), (Concurring and Dissenting opinion, Cappy, J.).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.