Christy v. Board of Pensions & Retirement of Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Christy v. Board of Pensions & Retirement of Philadelphia, 531 Pa. 88 (Pa. 1992)
611 A.2d 198; 1992 Pa. LEXIS 379
Cappy, Files, Flaherty, Larsen, McDermott, Nix, Papadakos, Zappala

Christy v. Board of Pensions & Retirement of Philadelphia

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Carmen Christy, was denied his pension benefits under the Municipal Retirement System Ordinance of the City of Philadelphia on the basis of alleged criminal misconduct, without ever having been formally charged or convicted. For the reasons stated in the opinion filed today in Mazzo v. Board of Pensions and Retirement of the City of Philadelphia, 531 Pa. 78, 611 A.2d 193 (1992), the denial of benefits was improper. The order of the Commonwealth Court is, accordingly, reversed.

ZAPPALA, J., files a dissenting statement.

Dissenting Opinion

ZAPPALA, Justice,

dissenting.

For the reasons set forth in my Dissenting Opinion in Mazzo v. Board of Pensions and Retirement of the City of Philadelphia, 531 Pa. 78, 611 A.2d 193 (1992), I would affirm the Order of the Commonwealth Court.

Reference

Full Case Name
Carmen CHRISTY v. BOARD OF PENSIONS AND RETIREMENT OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published