Commonwealth v. Dail

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania June 17, 1992

Commonwealth v. Dail, 531 Pa. 372 (Pa. 1992)

613 A.2d 541; 1992 Pa. LEXIS 418

Cappy, Consideration, Flaherty, Larsen, Matter, McDermott, Nix, Notes, Papadakos, Zappala

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in Commonwealth v. Corporan, — Pa. -, 613 A.2d 530 (1992), we affirm.

NIX, C.J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter. LARSEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter. *373ZAPPALA, J., concurs in the result. CAPPY, J., notes his dissent.

Reference

Full Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Roslyn DAIL
Status: Published