Commonwealth v. Brookins

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Commonwealth v. Brookins, 531 Pa. 397 (Pa. 1992)
613 A.2d 554; 1992 Pa. LEXIS 456
Cappy, Consideration, Flaherty, Larsen, Matter, McDermott, Nix, Papadakos, Zappala

Commonwealth v. Brookins

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Inasmuch as the Commonwealth filed a timely motion to vacate the erroneous sentence imposed by the trial court, appellant’s contention that the trial court was never accorded *398an opportunity to correct the sentence is without merit. For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in Commonwealth v. Corporan, — Pa.-, 613 A.2d 530 (1992), the decision of the Superior Court vacating the sentence imposed by the trial court and remanding for application of the mandatory minimum sentencing statute, 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508(a), is affirmed.

NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter. McDERMOTT, J., did not participate in the decision of this matter.

Reference

Full Case Name
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. John BROOKINS
Status
Published