Commonwealth v. Johnson
Commonwealth v. Johnson
531 Pa. 398; 613 A.2d 555; 1992 Pa. LEXIS 447
Commonwealth v. Johnson
Opinion of the Court
Appellant’s assertions regarding suppression of evidence and insufficiency of the evidence are without merit. Similarly, for the reasons stated in Commonwealth v. Corporan, — Pa. -, 613 A.2d 530 (1992), appellant’s assertions regarding application of the mandatory sentencing provision, 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508(a)(3), are without merit. Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.