Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1992

Commonwealth v. Johnson

Commonwealth v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided September 21, 1992 · Appeal No. 128 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1991 · Cappy, Consideration, Flaherty, Larsen, Matter, McDermott, Nix, Papadakos, Zappala
531 Pa. 398; 613 A.2d 555; 1992 Pa. LEXIS 447
Commonwealth v. Johnson

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*399ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s assertions regarding suppression of evidence and insufficiency of the evidence are without merit. Similarly, for the reasons stated in Commonwealth v. Corporan, — Pa. -, 613 A.2d 530 (1992), appellant’s assertions regarding application of the mandatory sentencing provision, 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508(a)(3), are without merit. Judgment of sentence affirmed.

NIX, C.J., and LARSEN and McDERMOTT, JJ., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.