Commonwealth v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania September 21, 1992

Commonwealth v. Johnson, 531 Pa. 398 (Pa. 1992)

613 A.2d 555; 1992 Pa. LEXIS 447

Cappy, Consideration, Flaherty, Larsen, Matter, McDermott, Nix, Papadakos, Zappala

Opinion of the Court

*399ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s assertions regarding suppression of evidence and insufficiency of the evidence are without merit. Similarly, for the reasons stated in Commonwealth v. Corporan, — Pa. -, 613 A.2d 530 (1992), appellant’s assertions regarding application of the mandatory sentencing provision, 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508(a)(3), are without merit. Judgment of sentence affirmed.

NIX, C.J., and LARSEN and McDERMOTT, JJ., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Reference

Full Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Clifford JOHNSON
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published