Edmond v. GAF Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Edmond v. GAF Corp., 532 Pa. 604 (Pa. 1992)
616 A.2d 1375; 1992 Pa. LEXIS 532
Cappy, Consideration, Files, Flaherty, Larsen, Nix, Papadakos, Zappala
Edmond v. GAF Corp.
Concurring Opinion
concurring.
I join in the order granting the Motion to Quash. I write separately to emphasize that conduct of an inferior court that impedes or prejudices the administration of justice will not go unchecked. Article 5, § 10(a) of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania vests the general supervisory and administrative authority over all of the courts in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has the power to remedy any acts of an inferior court that interfere with the proper disposition of the business of the courts, and will do so in the appropriate instance.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Motions to Quash granted.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Robert R. EDMOND, an individual Lloyd E. Kelly and Judith L. Kelly, his wife Joseph A. Bushless and Ruth Anne Bushless, his wife and Ralph Barber, an individual v. GAF CORPORATION Raymark Industries, Inc. the Celotex Corporation Keene Corporation Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation Owens-Illinois, Inc. Garlock, Inc. Pittsburgh Corning Corporation Armstrong World Industries, Inc. H.K. Porter Company, Inc. Fibreboard Corporation Anchor Packing Company A.P. Green Refractories Company Southern Textile Corporation the Gage Company Gateway Industrial Supply A-Best Products Company John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. Insul Company, Inc. Foster Wheeler Corporation the Sager Corporation Dresser Industries, Inc. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation Foseco, Inc. General Refractories Company J.H. France Refractories Company North American Refractories Company Quigley Company, Inc. Theim Corporation TYK Refractories Company and W.R. Grace Company, Hedman Mines, Limited and McClain Firebrick Company
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published