Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994

Beistle Co. v. Commonwealth, Board of Finance & Revenue

Beistle Co. v. Commonwealth, Board of Finance & Revenue
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided March 8, 1994 · Cappy, Consideration, Ease, Flaherty, Larsen, Montemuro, Nix, Papadakos, Zappala
638 A.2d 943 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Beistle Co. v. Commonwealth, Board of Finance & Revenue

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed.

NIX, C.J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this ease.

LARSEN, J., did not participate in the decision of this case.

*944MONTEMURO, J., who was an appointed Justice of the Court at the time of argument, participated in the decision of this case in his capacity as Senior Justice.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑