Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Tache

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Tache
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided October 28, 1994 · Montemuro
651 A.2d 524 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Tache

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 28th day of October, 1994, an Order and Rule to Show Cause having been entered by this Court on September 26, 1994, upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Rule is made absolute and, pursu- ■ ant to Rule 208(f), Pa.R.D.E., respondent is placed on temporary suspension until further definitive action by this Court;

2. Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.;

3. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia, in accordance with Rule 217(g), Pa.R.D.E., shall take such further action and make such further orders as may be necessary to protect fully the rights and interests of respondent’s clients.

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline within the meaning of Rule 402, Pa.R.D.E., pertaining to confidentiality.

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.