Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994

Commonwealth v. Schaeffer

Commonwealth v. Schaeffer
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided December 30, 1994 · Cappy, Castille, Consideration, Flaherty, Montemuro, Nix, Papadakos, Zappala
652 A.2d 294 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Commonwealth v. Schaeffer

Cases that cite this one

10 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Court being equally divided, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed.

MONTEMURO, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.*

FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA and CAPPY, JJ., dissent and would reverse the Order of the Superior Court and remand for a new trial.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.