Commonwealth v. Schaeffer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania December 30, 1994

Commonwealth v. Schaeffer, 539 Pa. 271 (Pa. 1994)

652 A.2d 294; 1994 Pa. LEXIS 837

Cappy, Castille, Consideration, Flaherty, Montemuro, Nix, Papadakos, Remand, Trial, Would, Zappala

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Court being equally divided, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed.

MONTEMURO, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.* FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA and CAPPY, JJ., dissent and would reverse the Order of the Superior Court and remand for a new trial.

Reference

Full Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Paul R. SCHAEFFER, Jr.
Cited By: 9 cases
Status: Published