Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1995

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fisher

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided January 23, 1995 · No. 698 Disciplinary Docket No. 2 · Cappy, Castille, Consideration, Flaherty, Matter, Montemuro, Nix, Papadakos, Zappala

653 A.2d 625; 539 Pa. 497 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

In re Discipline of Janklow (S.D. 2006)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Rule to Show Cause entered by this Court on May 4, 1994, is discharged. It is ORDERED that respondent be and he is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three years, retroactive to January 30, 1990, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

CASTILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

PAPADAKOS, J., dissents and would enter an order disbarring respondent.

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.