Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1995

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Marcone

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Marcone
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided June 20, 1995 · Flaherty, Matter, Montemuro, Nix, Who
661 A.2d 351 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Marcone

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 20th day of June, 1995, the Motion for Reconsideration, as supplemented, is granted, the Order entered by this Court on March 6, 1995, is vacated, and it is hereby ORDERED that respondent be subjected to public censure by the Supreme Court. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

*352MONTEMURO, J., who is sitting by designation, did not participate in this matter.

Dissenting Opinion

NIX, C.J.,

dissents and continues to be of the view that a three-year suspension is appropriate.

FLAHERTY, J., dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑