Poulson v. Johns-Manville Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania April 6, 1995

Poulson v. Johns-Manville Corp., 669 A.2d 875 (Pa. 1995)

543 Pa. 2; 1995 Pa. LEXIS 2502

Montemuro

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 1995, it appears from examination of the record that Keene Corporation was the only party defendant remaining in this matter when it came before the Superior Court and thereafter before this Court on Petition for Allowance of Appeal. Thus, the Order entered at No. 220 E.D. Allocatur Docket 1993 on December 21, 1994, staying the action as to Respondent Keene Corporation pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 362, was in error insofar as it further granted the Petition for Allowance of Appeal as to the remaining parties. The December 21, 1994 Order at No. 220 E.D. Allocatur Docket 1993 is therefore corrected to read only that the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is stayed as to Respondent Keene Corporation pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 362. The docket for this appeal is closed.

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.

Reference

Full Case Name: Henry POULSON and Norma Poulson, h/w, Edwin Miller and Ella Mae Miller, h/w, Richard Dizebba v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., Forty-Eight Insulation, Inc., Nicolet, Inc., Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation, GAF Corporation, Owens-Illinois Glass Company, Unarco Industries, Inc., H.K. Porter Company, J.P. Stevens Company, Eagle-Picher Industries, Garlock, Inc., U.S. Rubber Company and Uni-Royal, Inc., Celotex Corporation, Pacor, Inc., Amatex Corporation, Asbestos Textile Institute, Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, Asten Hill Manufacturing Company, Keasby-Mattison Company and Keene Corporation
Status: Published