Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1995

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Muraca

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Muraca
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided November 20, 1995 · Montemuro, Participates, Provided
543 Pa. 10; 669 A.2d 879; 1995 Pa. LEXIS 1461

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Muraca

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 20th day of November, 1995, there having been filed with this Court by Frank John Muraca his verified Statement of Resignation dated October 16, 1995, stating that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth of *11Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that the resignation of Frank John Muraca be and it is hereby accepted and he is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and it is further ORDERED that he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

MONTEMURO, J., participates by designation as a senior judge as provided by Pa.R.J.A 701(f).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑