Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1996

Commonwealth v. Everett

Commonwealth v. Everett
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided November 14, 1996 · Castille, Filing
685 A.2d 993; 546 Pa. 430; 1996 Pa. LEXIS 2233 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Commonwealth v. Everett

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of November, 1996, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The decision of the Superior Court is REVERSED and the ORDER of the trial court entered on April 4, 1994 suppressing physical evidence is REINSTATED. See Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449, 672 A2d 769 (1996). Jurisdiction is relinquished.

CASTILLE, J., is filing a dissenting statement.

Dissenting Opinion

CASTILLE, Justice,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent for the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449, 672 A.2d 769 (1996).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑