Lynnebrook & Woodbrook Associates v. Borough of Millersville
Lynnebrook & Woodbrook Associates v. Borough of Millersville
738 A.2d 993; 558 Pa. 564; 1999 Pa. LEXIS 1294
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Lynnebrook & Woodbrook Associates v. Borough of Millersville
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 1999, we GRANT the Petition for Allowance of Appeal LIMITED to the following issues:
Whether the Supreme Court should let stand a decision that allows a developer to use a road on someone else’s property to satisfy subdivision requirements, without even making the owner of that road a party to his subdivision request. Whether the Supreme Court should let stand a decision which contradicts a 1972 decision of the Commonwealth Court regarding who must be joined as a party in a subdivision matter and deprives a property owner of due process by not requiring personal notice.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.