Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1999

Lynnebrook & Woodbrook Associates v. Borough of Millersville

Lynnebrook & Woodbrook Associates v. Borough of Millersville
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided March 29, 1999
738 A.2d 993; 558 Pa. 564; 1999 Pa. LEXIS 1294 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Lynnebrook & Woodbrook Associates v. Borough of Millersville

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 1999, we GRANT the Petition for Allowance of Appeal LIMITED to the following issues:

Whether the Supreme Court should let stand a decision that allows a developer to use a road on someone else’s property to satisfy subdivision requirements, without even making the owner of that road a party to his subdivision request. Whether the Supreme Court should let stand a decision which contradicts a 1972 decision of the Commonwealth Court regarding who must be joined as a party in a subdivision matter and deprives a property owner of due process by not requiring personal notice.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.