Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1999

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Criden

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Criden
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided March 24, 1999 · Castille, Disbarred, Nigro, Respondent, Should, Show, Why
727 A.2d 119 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Criden

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 24th day of March, 1999, upon consideration of the Report and Recom*120mendations of the Disciplinary Board dated December 1,1998, it is hereby

ORDERED that LOUIS S. CRIDEN be and he is SUSPENDED from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of four (4) years to run consecutively to the period of suspension previously imposed by this Court on August 2, 1994, at No. 145 DB 91, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217 Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Justices CASTILLE and NIGRO dissent and would enter a rule upon respondent to show cause why he should not be disbarred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑