Siekierda v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania December 22, 2000

Siekierda v. Commonwealth, 762 A.2d 1085 (Pa. 2000)

563 Pa. 521; 2000 Pa. LEXIS 2990

Cappy

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, the order of the common pleas court is REVERSED, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with Commonwealth v. McCafferty, 568 Pa. 46, 758 A.2d 1155 (2000), and *522Harrington v. Commonwealth, 563 Pa. 565, 763 A.2d 386 (2000).

Justice CAPPY files a concurring statement.

Concurring Opinion

CAPPY, Justice,

concurring.

I join the per curiam reversal and remand for the reasons set forth more fully in my concurring opinion in Harrington v. Commonwealth, Dep’t of Transp., 563 Pa. 565, 763 A.2d 386. (2000).

Reference

Full Case Name: John W. SIEKIERDA, Appellee, v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING, Appellant
Cited By: 3 cases
Status: Published