Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2000

Siekierda v. Commonwealth

Siekierda v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided December 22, 2000 · Cappy
762 A.2d 1085; 563 Pa. 521; 2000 Pa. LEXIS 2990 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Siekierda v. Commonwealth

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, the order of the common pleas court is REVERSED, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with Commonwealth v. McCafferty, 568 Pa. 46, 758 A.2d 1155 (2000), and *522Harrington v. Commonwealth, 563 Pa. 565, 763 A.2d 386 (2000).

Justice CAPPY files a concurring statement.

Concurring Opinion

CAPPY, Justice,

concurring.

I join the per curiam reversal and remand for the reasons set forth more fully in my concurring opinion in Harrington v. Commonwealth, Dep’t of Transp., 563 Pa. 565, 763 A.2d 386. (2000).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑