Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Anonymous Attorney

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania September 27, 2000

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Anonymous Attorney, 759 A.2d 372 (Pa. 2000)

Files, Nigro

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2000, it is ordered that the charges docketed at No. 22 DB 1998 be dismissed.

Justice NIGRO files a dissenting statement.

Dissenting Opinion

NIGRO, Justice,

Dissenting.

I dissent because I find that there was clear and sufficient evidence to establish that Respondent committed numerous violations of Rule of Professional Conduct 1.1.

Reference

Full Case Name: OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. ANONYMOUS ATTORNEY
Status: Published