Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2000

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Anonymous Attorney

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Anonymous Attorney
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided September 27, 2000 · Files, Nigro
759 A.2d 372 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Anonymous Attorney

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2000, it is ordered that the charges docketed at No. 22 DB 1998 be dismissed.

Justice NIGRO files a dissenting statement.

Dissenting Opinion

NIGRO, Justice,

Dissenting.

I dissent because I find that there was clear and sufficient evidence to establish that Respondent committed numerous violations of Rule of Professional Conduct 1.1.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.