Gerrow v. John Royle & Sons

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Gerrow v. John Royle & Sons, 766 A.2d 346 (Pa. 2001)

Gerrow v. John Royle & Sons

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 23nd day of February, 2001, the court grants the above-captioned *347matter, and requests that the parties address the following issues:

a. Whether Rule 1085.3(b)(3) of the Rules of Civil Procedure allow a party to supplement the record with additional evidence, rather than limiting such evidence merely to that intended to supplement evidence already of record.
b. Whether the coordinate jurisdiction rule precludes the trial court’s consideration of an expert report, appended to the answer to a motion for summary judgment, that was not filed before the deadline for discovery set by a different judge in the case management order.

Reference

Full Case Name
David and Kristi GERROW, h/w v. JOHN ROYLE & SONS and Shincor Silicones, Inc. Petition of Shincor Silicones, Inc.
Status
Published