Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2001

In re Ferguson

In re Ferguson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided November 19, 2001 · Zappala
567 Pa. 550; 789 A.2d 196

In re Ferguson

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM INACTIVE STATUS

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 19th day of November, 2001, a Rule having been issued upon John Dickson Ferguson on September 24, 2001, to show cause why an order denying reinstatement should not be entered and, upon consideration of the responses filed, the Rule is made absolute and the Petition for Reinstatement is hereby denied. Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Disciplinary Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Justice ZAPPALA dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.