Grady v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Trach v. Fellin (Pa. Super. Ct. 2003)
- Haney v. Pagnanelli (Pa. Super. Ct. 2003)
- Harris v. Sangodeyi (Beaver County Court of Common Pleas 2004)
- Export Boxing & Crating Inc. v. Tech Met (Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas 2003)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of June, 2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted, limited to the following issue.
Whether the Superior Court, en banc, correctly applied the law when it reversed the decision of the trial court to preclüde Dr. Charles S. Beroes’ expert testimony.
The parties are directed to address the effect of Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir. 1923), and Daubert v. *47 Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), on the analysis of this issue.
Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.