MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF MONONGAHELA v. Carroll Township Authority
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Legal Access Plans v. Millinghausen, S. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020)
- Legal Access Plans v. Millinghausen, S. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020)
- Mikkilineni v. Indiana County Commissioners (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2009)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
And now, this 22nd day of January, 2002, the order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED. We specifically state that we do not adopt the rationale of the Commonwealth Court. See Commonwealth v. Tilghman, 543 Pa. 578, 673 A.2d 898, 904 (1996). Furthermore, we note that it appears that 42 Pa.C.S. § 7319(3), read in conjunction with 42 Pa.C.S. § 7304(a), dictates that venue for appeals from arbitration awards lies with the trial court that initially ordered the parties to proceed to arbitration. However, the issue of the applicability of § 7319(3) to this matter was waived via a concession made by Appellees before the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County. See Allegheny County CCP, tr. dated 1/25/1999, at 12. Thus, we are unable to explore the parameters of § 7319(3) by way of a full opinion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.