Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2002

In re Peterman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided August 1, 2002

569 Pa. 567; 806 A.2d 860; 2002 Pa. LEXIS 2101

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Com. v. Pinson, P. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021)
Com. v. Richard, T. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2019)
Com. v. Richard, T. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017)
Com. v. Nelson, E. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2002, a Rule having been entered by this Court on June 24, 2002, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., to show cause why Roger Clark Peter-man should not be placed on temporary suspension, upon consideration of the response filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Roger Clark Peterman is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.