Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2003

In re Sagett

In re Sagett
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided July 24, 2003
829 A.2d 672 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

In re Sagett

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of July, 2003, upon consideration of the Report and Rec*673ommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated April 4, 2008, the Petition for Review and response thereto, the Petition for Reinstatement is denied. Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑