Commonwealth v. Batista
Commonwealth v. Batista
576 Pa. 611; 840 A.2d 988; 2003 Pa. LEXIS 2160
Commonwealth v. Batista
Opinion of the Court
AND NOW, this 19th day of November, 2003, the petition for allowance of appeal is granted limited to the issue of whether trial counsel was ineffective in allowing the jury to be selected in Petitioner’s absence. The case is remanded to the PCRA court with direction to conduct an evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether trial counsel was ineffective in allowing the jury to be selected in Petitioner’s absence.
Jurisdiction is relinquished.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.