Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2003

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kurtz

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kurtz
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided July 24, 2003
829 A.2d 672 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kurtz

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of July, 2003, there having been filed with this Court by David L. Kurtz his verified Statement of Resignation dated April 30, 2003, stating that he desires to resign from the Bar. of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that the resignation of David L. Kurtz be and it is hereby accepted and he is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and it is further ORDERED that he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑