Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

In re Sagett

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
In re Sagett, 829 A.2d 672 (Pa. 2003)

In re Sagett

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of July, 2003, upon consideration of the Report and Rec*673ommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated April 4, 2008, the Petition for Review and response thereto, the Petition for Reinstatement is denied. Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Reference

Full Case Name
In the Matter of Samuel H. SAGETT. Petition for reinstatement
Status
Published
↑