Kit v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Kit v. Mitchell, 842 A.2d 368 (Pa. 2004)
Cappy, Castille, Eakin, Newman, Nigro, Saylor, Zappala
Kit v. Mitchell
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The appeal is dismissed as having been improvidently granted.
Former Chief Justice ZAPPALA did not participate in the decision of this case.
Justice NIGRO files a dissenting statement.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent from the Court’s order to dismiss this case as improvidently granted as I believe that Appellant has raised meritorious issues that this Court should address.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Michael A. KIT v. Richard A. MITCHELL, Esq., and March, Hurwitz, Demarco & Mitchell, and Cramp, D'Iorio, McConchie & Forbes
- Status
- Published