Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2004

Kit v. Mitchell

Kit v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided February 17, 2004 · Cappy, Castille, Eakin, Files, Former, Newman, Nigro, Saylor, Zappala
577 Pa. 69; 842 A.2d 368; 2004 Pa. LEXIS 86

Kit v. Mitchell

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

Former Chief Justice ZAPPALA did not participate in the decision of this case. Justice NIGRO files a dissenting statement.

Dissenting Opinion

Justice NIGRO

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from the Court’s order to dismiss this case as improvidently granted as I believe that Appellant has raised meritorious issues that this Court should address.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑