Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2004

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hammer

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hammer
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided October 13, 2004
580 Pa. 491; 862 A.2d 74; 2004 Pa. LEXIS 2854

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hammer

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2004, respondent having failed to comply with the Order entered by this Court on August 12, 2004, it is

*492ORDERED that respondent is hereby placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 208(f)(5), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Further, Office of Disciplinary Counsel is directed to consider respondent’s conduct at the September 10, 2004, proceeding in any subsequently filed Petition for Discipline.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑