Commonwealth v. Davidson
Commonwealth v. Davidson
871 A.2d 185; 582 Pa. 356; 2005 Pa. LEXIS 446
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Commonwealth v. Davidson
Opinion
*357 ORDER
AND NOW, this 15th day of March 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following questions:
Whether 18 Pa.C.S. § 6312(d) is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad?
Did the General Assembly intend that a person charged under 18 Pa.C.S. § 6312(d) be subjected to individual counts for each piece of child pornography possessed?
If the General Assembly so intended, is it constitutional to impose separate punishments for each conviction?
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.