Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2005

In re Bucks County Investigating Grand Jury

In re Bucks County Investigating Grand Jury
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided February 24, 2005 · Eakin, Files
869 A.2d 482; 582 Pa. 93; 2005 Pa. LEXIS 351 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

In re Bucks County Investigating Grand Jury

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of February, 2005, upon consideration of the Application for Review, pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 722 and Pa.R.A.P. 3331(a), it is hereby ordered that the Application for Review is GRANTED and the matter is remanded for supplementation of the record, to the extent deemed necessary.

It is further noted that the trial judge may limit any hearings if such hearings would merely duplicate hearings held pursuant to this Court’s order of November *48312, 2004 in the related matter of 119 MM 2004.

Justice CASTILLE files a Dissenting Statement in which Justice EAKIN joins.

Justice CASTILLE.

I respectfully dissent. See In re Bucks County Investigating Grand Jury, Petition of Voicenet Communications, Inc., Omni Telecom, Inc., and Brian Adelson, — pa. -, 867 A.2d 1262 (Pa. 2005) (Castille, J., dissenting, joined by Eakin, J.); In re Bucks County Investigating Grand Jury, Application of Voicenet Communications, Inc., Omni Telecom Inc., Brian Adelson, — Pa. -, 862 A.2d 581, 582 (Pa. 2004) (Castille, J., dissenting); In re Bucks County Investigating Grand Jury, Application of Ronald P. Power and Richard A. Sprague on Behalf of Himself and Sprague & Sprague, — Pa. -, 861 A.2d 876, 876-81 (Pa. 2004) (Castille, J., dissenting, joined by Eakin, J.).

Justice EAKIN joins this dissenting statement.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.