Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2005

In re Hykel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided September 26, 2005

884 A.2d 842 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2005, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated July 8, 2005, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.